On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Evgeny Khramtsov <[email protected]> wrote: > Although I also support the removal, I think it might be needed for > backward compatibility with MUC spec, no?
Currently there is no "muc bridge" or compatibility spec, so if such a thing were written it could certainly be added there, or the muc bridge could update the description instead of a separate "subject" node. —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
