> > I do not think there is a need to attribute messages to specific > > clients. From a recipient perspective, messages come from other > > users. > > I strongly disagree. Having a proper end-to-end message attribution to clients > is a requirement for many XMPP protocols, be it Chat State Notifications, > Message Acks, Last Message Correction or file transfers. > Once the basics are set, we could also use MIX-PM-to-ourself to synchronize > the read-state of individual MIXes. > > IMO, providing client attribution is the main selling point for the > significantly > increased complexity of MIX over MUC, and reverting that won't do the > protocol any good. Feel free to add this to the Brussels list.
[Steve Kille] I am not sure what benefit you would have in knowing that a message comes from [email protected]/df45o5678 (client) rather than [email protected] (user) Steve _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
