Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:55:42 +0100 Georg Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, I see xmpp as a possible solution here for multiple > reasons. > > There is a hype about Slack right now, but Slack is rather expensive. > If we could provide a similar UX in top of self-hosted XMPP, that > would be a good selling point. > > Furthermore, big companies are often bound by compliance requirements > (archival duties, on site storage, etc). This is another selling > point. > > IMHO all we need here is a server package / consultancy to roll out > the implementation, a usable set of clients for mobile, desktop and > the web, and a compelling 2FA authentication mechanism.
I tend to agree with Peter (if I understand him correctly): what you suggest is building/offering some sort of service on top of XMPP (which is out of scope of XSF). And I don't think this can be done by XMPP community either, because the community is very separated and have different points of view. I think we have already built XMPP network for enthusiasts, there is nothing more we can do. But we got stuck at this point. For example, even "community favourite" Conversations is moving towards service oriented software as far as I know: I guess simply because there is nowhere to move within the community. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
