On 6 Feb 2017, at 12:01, Evgeny Khramtsov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:44:49 +0100 > Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Maybe I don't understand the question, but Bind2 still does resource >> binding. > > Yes, but in a different way. While RFC6120 tells how to *exactly* bind > a resource: > >> the client MUST bind a resource to the stream as described in the >> following sections > > Furthermore, XEP-0198 already violates this requirement on > stream resumption.
Nothing stops further specs from changing the core rules by negotiation. This is not a violation, it’s agreeing to do something different. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
