On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Guus der Kinderen <[email protected]> wrote: > Is footnote 10 "Support can be enabled via an external component or an > internal server module/plugin." relevant?
I think the idea was to say "even if a server isn't compliant because it doesn't support this, a service using that server could still be compliant by shipping a component", but that could have been clearer. Maybe it's not worth including; thanks! > I suggest o remove footnote 6, and simply make CAPS a requirement on it's > own. Good idea; thanks! —Sam _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
