Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:49:30 +0000 Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Initial SASL response was not in the original SASL specification, so > it was added later. So some clients (possibly using older SASL > libraries) would never emit it. The server can't know whether the > client doesn't support initial response, so it has to respond to > absent initial response with an empty string. OK, I see, thanks. Anyway, would be great adding brief rationale why this does matter, because that's not only me who thought there is no difference and treats "=" as an empty string (from private conversations with other developers). _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
