On 2/20/17 2:20 AM, Jonas Wielicki wrote: > I feel that using BIND2 resources---albeit this is likely to become the new > standard---harms readability a lot. However, I can also see that using > examples which do not fit the current standards lead to developers > implementing the wrong things, such as clients which encourage the use of > descriptive and user-chosen resources. > > I think a middle-way is needed here, and I do not have a good idea how to > address this.
In more recent RFCs (e.g., RFC 8048) I've been using things like this: <presence from='[email protected]/dr4hcr0st3lup4c'/> That's "Capulet's Orchard" backwards in h4x0r. It looks ugly enough to be semi-random but if you know the code it's speakable. Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
