Looks reasonable to me. I'd appreciate a namespace bump.
On 16 March 2017 at 11:03, Steve Kille <[email protected]> wrote: > > Georg has suggested a new order for proxy JID. I've discussed with Kevin > Smith and we think the rationale for change of order makes sense. > > The original rationale for this syntax as to align to "plus addressing" used > with email address. If we are going to change the order a new separator > seems sensible. Our proposed choice is to use octothorpe. Underscore was > a fallback. > > So the thinking is to change from '[email protected]' to > '123456#[email protected]' > > I will make this change in the next set of updates, unless there are > objections made to the list > > > Steve > > > > ***** Hi Steve, > > I would like to suggest changing the proxy JID format from > '[email protected]' to > '[email protected]'. > > The rationale is as follows: > > 1. it better corresponds to the hierarchical structure > (user->channel->service->domain->country) > > 2. the channel name may contain a '+', the user identifier not. > Splitting the identifier will be easier and less error-prone > if we can just do anon_jid.split('+', max=2) instead of first > looking for the '@' and then doing a right-side-search for '+'. > > 3. it might be easier to compare JIDs: > if (anon_jid.endswith('+' + channel_jid)) { ... } > > > Kind regards, > > Georg > > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
