On 23 March 2017 at 08:38, Georg Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: > * Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> [2017-03-23 08:22]: >> Consider an chess-game service build on top of MIX. Tim and Tom want to >> play a game and agree on the "TimAndTomsGame" as name. Now both clients >> want to join-and-maybe-create the TimAndTomsGame MIX channel. > > I think this is exactly what ยง6.5.3 "Creating a Channel for Ad Hoc Use" > is meant for. One of the two creates such a "nameless" channel and sends > an invitation, there is really no need to have both parties trying to > create it, or any kind of out-of-band name arbitration. > > Just because in MUC there was no explicit way to create such a private > channel, we don't need to mimic the old behavior in MIX. > > I'm not convinced by this example, and I think there is no other > compelling use case for that functionality.
+1. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
