Jonas,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Standards [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonas
> Wielicki
> Sent: 01 April 2017 20:37
> To: XMPP Standards
> Subject: Re: [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0369 (Mediated Information
> eXchange (MIX))
> 
> Hi Steve at al.,
> 
> I have a few questions about handling of nicknames in MIX.
> 
> 1. regarding §6.1.5 Setting a Nick:
> 
> There is an example on how to set the nickname. I *assume* that other
> participants are informed about the nickname change as it will be published
> in the participants PubSub node, right?. If this is the case, it would be 
> great if
> we could have this clarified in the text.
[Steve Kille] 

I will put some clarification here.   There is an interesting UI question here. 
  Presence is the natural equivalent to MUC, and I am sure that this will 
continue to be shown for MIX channels.   However,  in MIX, participants are a 
superset.    A simple UI approach will be simply to ignore participants.    A 
more sophisticated UI will subscribe to the presence node, which will enable 
the client to show channel participants that are not online.     I suspect that 
the UI will then need to give the user a choice as to whether to show this or 
not.
> 
> 2. regarding §5.6 Determining the Participants in a Channel:
> 
> This section is inconsistent with other references to the node. First, the 
> node
> name doesn’t match (urn:xmpp:nodes:participants vs.
> urn:xmpp:mix:nodes:participants). 
[Steve Kille] 

Ooops.   I will do a check to ensure that we always say xmpp:mix:nodes   and 
never  xmpp:nodes  

 

Second, the nickname is represented as
> attribute to <item/> and not as an attribute to the <participant/> child.
[Steve Kille] 
 

Yes.  5.6 is definitely wrong.   Will sort.

Looking at this is making me reflect on the participant node XML.

Currently the participant item syntax is (example):

<items node='urn:xmpp:mix:nodes:participants'>
    <item id='123456#[email protected]'>
        <participant xmlns='urn:xmpp:mix:0'
                    nick='thirdwitch'/>
      </item>
</items>


I am wondering if it would be better as:


<items node='urn:xmpp:mix:nodes:participants'>
      <item id='123456#[email protected]' xmlns='urn:xmpp:mix:0'>
              <nick>thirdwitch</nick>
      </item>
</items>


I'd welcome input from those with more XML experience and "XMPP house style"

> 
> 
> Thanks for your consideration,
> Jonas
[Steve Kille] 


Thanks for pointing this out.

Regards

Steve

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to