On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Jonas Wielicki <[email protected]> wrote:
> 7. Vote on accepting ProtoXEP: ISR-SASL2 as Experimental > > [Minutes Takers note: context: > <https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/isr-sasl2.html>] > > Tobias, Daniel and Link Mauve will vote on list. > > Dave wants Section 6 to be removed, to which Florian has already agreed, > and > reminds about the namespaced attributes. Dave is thus -1 for now, but > thinks > that this can be resolved. > > Sam also wants to see Florians changes and is thus -1 for now. > +0, but doesn't matter much as there are others voting -1. As a side note, requiring access to channel binding data, will disqualify some deployment environments. AFAIK standard Java APIs have no way to access channel binding data of TLS connections. Maybe bouncycastle can, though. Cheers, Tobi
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
