Disclaimer: I haven’t looked into jingle stuff at all yet. On Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 16:34:20 CEST Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Daniel Gultsch wrote: > > - There is too much 'optional' stuff in the XEP. The hashing stuff for > > example is virtually useless because I can't be sure the sender will send > > that. > > I would like to introduce a way for the received to request a checksum, > of either the entire file or a range of it, but for some usecases it > may not be possible (for example when a client gets its data from a > pipe, it can read it once but not more).
That would still work if the sender can send the hash at the end of the transfer. I am not sure if it makes sense to allow requesting only a range of the file to be hashed -- do you have a specific use-case in mind where that makes more sense than hashing the whole file? -- jwi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
