On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > Firstly, section 6 of XEP-0001 clearly states that the Author's job is > to gather and incorporate feedback from the community during the > lifetime of the XEP. It also clearly states that the XEP author should > be subscribed to this mailing list. Therefore, I argue that it is > entirely reasonable to make that requirement on an Author.
Fair enough, FWIW, I have no idea if the author in question does these things, me saying that I wasn't sure shouldn't lead people to think the author has been neglecting their duties. There are many other reasons not to reply; their position maynot have changed since this was originally brought up, or they may just want to see the discussion unfold more before weighing in and possibly influencing it. > As for Council members not reading the list, I really don't understand > this attitude. This is, by my count, the tenth thread on the Standards > list this month, and many of those are Council Minutes threads. This > is hardly high traffic. It seems remarkable that any Council members > feel it's acceptable to routinely ignore the list to the degree > stated. Email is a pain, and a not everyone will care about all list content enough to read it all beyond skimming the titles. I don't see this as a problem. —Sam _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
