Hi, 2017-05-24 18:53 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <[email protected]>: > Authors didn't need to approve the feedback
> Because authors now get PRs written for them as routine, we seem to > have drifted somewhat, so that the authors now hold some control over > what goes in. Approving PRs seems fine, but really only if this is > approval in terms of consensus calls - not a matter of personal > agreement or otherwise. I did not know that. 'Consensus' seems to me like a very slippery slope especially when it comes to controversial changes. In any case since 'author approval' is irrelevant what is you want Council to do about the situation? cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
