On 31 May 2017 at 17:42, Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> wrote: > The proposed solution would pretty much invalid the OMEMO protocol > audit (since important crypto parts are being changed) >
If I give a solution that doesn't require *any* changes to libsignal (i.e. the compromise Chris Ballinger thought was fine), would you then still have this concern? Remko
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
