On 2 June 2017 at 09:14, Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> wrote: > 2017-05-25 13:20 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <[email protected]>: >> So you want the outcome to be: >> >> a) The publish option is known to the server, in which case it is >> treated as a precondition or override as given in the registry. >> b) The publish option is not known to the server, in which case the >> publish is rejected. >> >> Does that seem about right? > > I didn't take that as an agreement. I thought it was just a > clarification regarding my question. >
Ah, sorry, I wasn't clear enough. Yes, that was a proposal that i thought matched your aims. > But if it was indeed an agreement (and nobody else objects) I guess I > can write up a paragraph for XEP-0060. I think that's the ideal first step, yes. I would be curious to explore if it would be worthwhile extracting publish options out into a distinct XEP; this would perhaps depend on whether we were going to have to add a feature for this new? behaviour. Dave. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
