2017-06-02 13:48 GMT+02:00 Kevin Smith <[email protected]>: > I can see an argument for publishing a standards-track version of 384 > reflecting the current state, so there’s a stable identifier for it under > version 0.x, to reflect what’s deployed, before moving on with further > development.
This does sound like a sensible compromise to me. In that case I would change my PR to not change the track. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
