Just a holding message that I’ve seen this thread is in my inbox and I need to 
read/reply - I’ve just not got down to it yet.

/K

> On 28 Jul 2017, at 02:23, Chris Ballinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This adds an optional "high" and "low" priority value, where "high" depends 
> on whether the message contains a <body> or <encrypted> (OMEMO) element. This 
> helps limit overly verbose push notifications for things like typing 
> notifications, without requiring transmission of anything about the message 
> contents.
> 
> The suggestion is that "high" priority pushes trigger something visible to 
> the user, whereas "low" priority pushes can be filtered or sent as background 
> fetches.
> 
> This is a simplified variation of an earlier proposal that defined multiple 
> message types.
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]
> _______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to