On 4 Oct 2017, at 07:01, Georg Lukas <[email protected]> wrote:
> there is a number of open issues with how message routing currently
> works for the IM use case, and where it doesn't work consistently
> because of different patches (Carbons, MAM) that we have applied over
> time to modernize it.
> 
> XEP-0280 has been Last-Called twice in the last two years, and its
> problems were never quite addressed. I also strongly dislike the vague
> rules it contains, because they are bound to result in inconsistent UX
> (see https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/434). The discussion has shown,
> however, that we as a community don't have a good picture of how those
> rules should look.
> 
> Now would be a good time to step back, analyze the situation we are in,
> and to work out how the future should look and feel (and work).
> 
> I was kindly asked to state the current problems in a TL;DR compatible
> way, so I would like to attempt two things.
> 
> First, I've prepared a slide deck for a hypothetical Summit talk:
> https://op-co.de/tmp/whats-wrong-with-xmpp-2017.pdf
> 
> Second, I'll write a series of (hopefully short) messages to this list,
> picking one issue at a time, in the hope to arrive at a Big Picture some
> time in the future, and to ignite discussion on the individual issues.
> 
> My primary focus is IM, so I'm probably overlooking the challenges of
> IoT, VoIP and any other use cases, and my ideas might break expectations
> created by those. Please chime in and add your knowledge to the
> discussion!

Thanks Georg,

I’ve had a quick scan through, and the deck seems like a sensible trigger for 
discussion. Thanks for driving this.

/K
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to