On 16 Oct 2017, at 10:09, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 16 October 2017 at 10:03, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> It’s certainly the path of least resistance for web clients. I’m somewhat >> concerned that >> a) “anything goes” means you can have essentially no reliable >> interoperability - potentially even between the same client, if it happens >> to be running in a different browser. >> b) while low-resistance to browser clients, it leaves desktop/mobile clients >> (or at least those clients not prepared to render in a webview) out in the >> cold, and this doesn’t fill me with good feelings. > > We can define a "very rich document" XHTML dialect if that'd suit?
I don’t think we need to avoid something Experimental for this, but I’m noting that I think we need something at some point (and ‘very rich document’ XHTML might be that thing). /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
