On Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 17:49:26 CET JC Brand wrote: > jonasw asks that the previously rejected ProtoXEP "Body Markup Hints" be > reconsidered as a means to bridge the above two ProtoXEPs. > > https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/bmh.html
Sorry, to correct: This is not what I said (or at least not what I meant to say), and not what I hope BMH to be in this context. I was proposing BMH as an opt-in mechanism for Styling, because Styling with opt-in is essentially BMH with a specific markup. It won’t play any role in bridgin Markup and Styling. kind regards, Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
