Since XEP-0114 is historical and its purpose predates SRV records, I'm wondering why it was included in the suite for server compliance?
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017, at 11:50, Dave Cridland wrote: > > On 1 November 2017 at 17:14, Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017, at 11:47, Jonas Wielicki wrote: > > >> On Montag, 16. Oktober 2017 18:38:46 CET Jonas Wielicki wrote: > > >> > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on > > >> > XEP-0387. > > > > > > What would folks think about changing the title of these compliance > > > suites to "2018" and then moving them forward by the end of the year? > > > > > > Then we can start working on the 2019 suites throughout next year and > > > start trying to have the years compliance suites in by January 1st of > > > the year in the title. > > > > > > > Let's do this. > > I have bumped the year now; it will be published later. Since this was > the only change, consider this the alert for a new version of the suites > which we can vote on when the LC expires. > > Thanks! > > —Sam > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
