On Montag, 12. Februar 2018 08:45:23 CET Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:41:54 +0100
> Christian Schudt <christian.sch...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > - I am also missing a cache which maps entities to capabilities, i.e.
> > JIDs to disco#info objects. This is the whole point of the XEP (to be
> > able to know an entity’s abilities without service discovery). This
> > cache should be probably be non-persistent. The "Capability Hash
> > Cache“ (hash -> disco#info) is actually only the
> > intermediate/auxiliary cache.
> I think the XEP doesn't solve the main problem of cache invalidation
> and that's why I think it's pointless and I'm not going to implement it
> until the invalidating rules are described.

Could you please be specific which cache you’d like to see properly 
invalidated? Do you mean the (hash -> disco#info) cache or the (entity JID -> 
hash / disco#info) cache?

kind regards,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org

Reply via email to