On Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2018 10:29:18 CET Kevin Smith wrote:
> FWIW, I think this isn’t what the standard already says, although may be
> sensible.

Hmm… I think you are right there. "execute" is equivalent to whatever the 
Responder says in the "execute" attribute on <actions/>. Which unfortunately 
does *not* have a default value. The interpretation of being equivalent to 
"next" is only done in a "typical interpretation" of a requester:

> The action "execute" is always allowed, and is equivalent to the action 
> "next".

(this is the passage which is to be changed) and later on:

> If the <actions/> possesses the "execute" attribute, that value is the 
> default button or option. If the <actions/> does not possess the "execute" 
> attribute, there is no default button or option.

Also, there is (for empty/no <actions/>):

> The action "execute" is equivalent to the action "complete".

So given all that, I wonder whether the proposed wording should be adapted to 
reflect that the value of the "execute" attribute should always take 
precedence over the interpretation of what "execute" means?


kind regards,
Jonas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to