Re: [Standards] [STANDARDS] XEP-0394: too weak to replace XEP-0071

[Stephen Paul Weber]

Can we really replace XEP-0071 with something that is as "powerful" without triggering all the reasons that people wanted it deprecated in the first place?

I would say if you want the power, keep using XEP-0071. It's implemented just about everywhere, and works very well, no matter what the "status" on the XEP says.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________