On 4/12/18 3:58 PM, Sam Whited wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, at 16:41, Christian Schudt wrote:
>> here some implementation for XEP 131 and 141 because you said „doesn’t 
>> have enough implementation“.
> In general I think "implementations" is meant to read "clients or 
> applications", here. If something is implemented in a library (or several 
> libraries), but then never used in a real client or application then we still 
> can't really claim to have any experience with the protocol in a "real-world" 
> scenario. I'm not sure there's anything official saying this has to be the 
> case, but that's my take on what "implementations" means.

But we might never know if someone is building an application or service
on top of a library...


Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org

Reply via email to