On 12 April 2018 at 22:58, Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, at 16:41, Christian Schudt wrote: > > here some implementation for XEP 131 and 141 because you said „doesn’t > > have enough implementation“. > > In general I think "implementations" is meant to read "clients or > applications", here. If something is implemented in a library (or several > libraries), but then never used in a real client or application then we > still can't really claim to have any experience with the protocol in a > "real-world" scenario. I'm not sure there's anything official saying this > has to be the case, but that's my take on what "implementations" means. >
Indeed true. I know of one non-public one based on top of Smack; I'll see about getting documentation for it. And, embarrassingly, I realised the project I've been working on also implements XEP-0141: https:github.com/surevine/web-chat/ implements XEP-0141 for forms found in XEP-0346. So there are two, and one is open source. Hoorah? > > —Sam > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
