On 09.05.2018 15:53, Steve Kille wrote: > Florian made some broader comments. > > I do not agree with the assertion that MIX is bloated. It provides a > similar function to MUC and is of comparable size to the MUC and PubSub > specs. MUC and PubSub often are used as excuse to write another big bloated XEP. Peter Waher also referred to them when he was faced with the same criticism. MUC and PubSub really can not be used as precedent for good specifications, they are prime examples of what is wrong with the one big monolithic specification approach. (PubSub in particular).
If we want people to implement our stuff, then we need to craft slim, easy to digest (base) specifications. Implementers should be able to easily determine which parts of the spec are required to get an early interoperable implementation going. This also reduces the time and effort needed for the first "I've made it" experience. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
