Hi,
I think presence isn't important to have the real JID. If you know the
real JID for a participant you can subscribe to its real JID to receive
the presence directly from the user instead of both MIX and User.
The point is the tag "<mix/>" inside of the message. The way to add or
use real JIDs in presence makes no sense IMHO.
Kind regards.
Manuel Rubio.
El 2018-05-24 17:54, Steve Kille escribió:
> Dave,
>
> That would also be problematic, since entities would then need to process
> presence rather differently, even more so than they do for MUC now.
>
> I was thinking simply:
>
> <presence from='{{proxyjid}}' id='{{tracking id}}'>
>
> <!-- ... -->
>
> <mix xmlns='...'>
>
> <jid/>
>
> <nickname/>
>
> </mix>
>
> </presence>
>
> _ _
>
> _[STEVE KILLE]_
>
> _SO WHAT VALUE IS THE PROXY JID GIVING, GIVEN THAT THE DATA WHICH THE CLIENT
> MIGHT HAVE DERIVED FROM THE PROXY JID IS NOW ENCODED IN THE MESSAGE??_
>
> _ _
>
> _I WAS SUGGESTING MESSAGE CAME FROM COVEN@MIX.EXAMPLE YOU ARE SUGGESTING IT
> COMES FROM 5Q3509Q759348#COVEN@MIX.EXAMPLE_
>
> _ _
>
> _WHAT BENEFIT IS THE PROXY JID GIVING TO THE CLIENT?_
>
> _ _
>
> Steve
>
> _ _
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards [1]
> Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
> _______________________________________________
Links:
------
[1] https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________
