Hi * Ненахов Андрей <[email protected]> [2018-10-05 16:37]: > What you suggest imposes additional logic on the XMPP server to decide > between 'important' and 'not important'.
I think that in the long term, we need to empower the server to do just that. You propose that the client (or user?) should make the decision what is important, by sending every push to the client. However, this is bad for battery usage (you don't want your device to wake up on every MUC presence change). It would be more elegant to have the client tell the server what it considers as important (imagine account-wide notification settings), and the server sending pushes according to that. What's still not solved is how to interface that with E2EE (an encrypted MUC message might or might not contain your name, demaning a push). In the short term, we should codify the rough set of guidelines in the XEP, as suggested by Thilo and Daniel, and have high-priority and background pushes. Georg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
