<editor-hat> On Donnerstag, 8. November 2018 17:54:46 CET Jonas Schäfer wrote: > <editor-hat> > > @flowdalic wrote: > > Strictly speaking, every disco#info IQ result must contain the > > disco#info feature. But looking at the existing examples in various > > XEPs and implementations, this feature is usually omitted. Hence we > > clarify in XEP-0030 that announcing the 'disco#info' feature is > > optional, as support for it is implicitly acknowledged by returning a > > result IQ to a 'disco#info' IQ request. > > > > After thinking about the situation a while, this is currently my preferred > > solution. But I am not sure if it may causes issues regarding entity > > capabilities 1.0 and 2.0 (Should 'disco#info' be part of the hash input or > > not? Probably it should.) . Hence it possibly deserves some discussion by > > the community and by council. > > > > For a motivation see > > > > * #715 > > > > * [processone/ejabberd#2661](https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/ > > issues/2661) > > Bringing it to the list so that people can take a look. > </editor-hat>
Sigh... forgot to include the link where the quote came from: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/716 </editor-hat> kind regards, Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
