On 13 Jan 2019, at 11:29, Jonas Schäfer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Dienstag, 25. Dezember 2018 17:43:28 CET Kevin Smith wrote:
>>> On 20 Dec 2018, at 20:27, Tedd Sterr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Dave noticed that Jonas pushed through XEP-0412 (XMPP Compliance Suites
>>> 2019) before all votes have been made, and has literally no idea what do
>>> to about it as there is no process to handle a process violation. Jonas
>>> suggests reverting the changes in Git; Georg suggests pretending it never
>>> happened unless the final vote contradicts, and revert if so. Dave thinks
>>> reverting would be a bad idea as it could lead to 0412 referring to a
>>> different XEP.
>> I don’t really want to be the blocker of progress, but there are various
>> things in here that I’m not convinced by. 
> 
> Sorry for putting the pressure on you by delaying the suites for such long 
> time, even though I did not intend to do so.
> 
>> Some of them (368) were existing
>> things that I don’t feel are really essential in a core client/server
> 
> Noted and fixed.
> 
>> , or
>> are inconsistent (84 but not 163 in a server), 
> 
> Noted and fixed.
> 
>> others are new (what does it
>> mean for 184 to be supported by a server? 
> 
> That was simply a typo, thanks for pointing it out.
> 
>> 398 is neat, but does it deserve
>> to be in a compliance suite already?). 
> 
> Yes, I think so. It provides valuable support in moving the ecosystem forward.
> 
>> I’m also not sure that 7622 is
>> actually practically required for interop, as opposed to 6122, and a note
>> to that effect would be sane.
> 
> Changed.
> 
> (The actual change isn’t published yet, but it only hinges on the docker 
> build.)

Thanks. +1 based on the changes described above.

/K
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to