Hi Larry,

I don't think that this mailinglist is the right place to discuss your
questions.

Although I'm not familiar with your issue, I think you should address them
at Google, not the XMPP standards mailinglist. I suggest that you start at
https://support.google.com/ and see where that gets you.

Regards,

  Guus

On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 13:17, larry martz <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have a couple questions... While looking into my Google account after a
> factory reset I was asked to choose what phone I Wanted to restore. But my
> options were exactly the same. In addition Google didn't recognize my phone
> number, I had changed my password the week before but the old one was the
> one I had to use.
> And çan someone explain the G-suite, and how that site can be a administor
> to numerous devices at one time. Last how can I not allow that type of an
> administrator.tnx
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019, 11:49 AM Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/12/19 1:01 PM, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
>> > On Montag, 17. Dezember 2018 16:50:17 CET Sebastian Riese wrote:
>> >> XEP-0261 <https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0261.html> uses "bytestream"
>> >> for the overall Jingle session and "session" for the IBB session (at
>> >> least it does so consistently). This is *extremely* confusing. For
>> >>
>> >> example section 2.5 reads:
>> >>> Whenever a party is finished with a particular session within the
>> >>
>> >> bytestream, it SHOULD send an IBB <close/> as shown above. This applies
>> >> to all sessions, including the last one.
>> >>
>> >>> To close the bytestream itself (e.g., because the parties have
>> >>
>> >> finished using all sessions associated with the bytestream), a party
>> >> sends a Jingle session-terminate action as defined in XEP-0166.
>> >>
>> >> This nomenclature is just wrong: The Jingle session manages multiple
>> >> In-Band Bytestream sessions. If you close the Jingle session there may
>> >> be zero or more bytestream sessions that are closed (and perhaps other
>> >> transport sessions – Jingle does not prescribe uniform transports in a
>> >> session).
>> >>
>> >> If you all agree I would make a PR to fix this issue. My proposal is to
>> >> use "session" for Jingle sessions and "bytestream" for IBB sessions, if
>> >> this is deemed to be too confusing also, I could spell out "Jingle
>> >> session" and "IBB session".
>> >
>> > I suggest you take the silence as agreement.
>>
>> WFM
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Standards mailing list
>> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
>> Unsubscribe: [email protected]
>> _______________________________________________
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
>
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to