On 1/17/19 3:43 AM, Ralph Meijer wrote: > On 17/01/2019 11.25, Evgeny wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:05 PM, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: >>> we do not require it until Final - not even Draft has an absolute >>> requirement. >> >> I thought transitioning to Draft requires Call For Implementors, >> but whatever. Again this raises a question about how sane all >> those XEP statuses nowadays. I know this is copied from IETF >> workflow, but they have the same problems: a large number of RFCs >> without implementations or with abandoned partial implementations. >> >> But since the XSF standards development is severely understaffed >> I think raising these questions makes even less sense (actually >> this is true for almost any XSF workflow nowadays because of this). > > I don't see large numbers of specifications being abandoned as a > problem. It is a trove of thought experiments, some with code to go with > it, that might be of use later. Leaving them as Deferred doesn't costs > us anything.
+1! /psa _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
