Hi List, Looking at XEP-0409 and XEP-386, it appears that 0409 says:
> A client activating IM-NG MUST NOT also activate Carbons. while 0386 says that after binding, the server MUST: > Silently enable carbons for this session While not strictly conflicting in RFC legalese (with bind 2.0 it’s the server that enables carbons), I don't think this is the original intent of the writing. Should there be a paragraph regarding this in 0386 saying that if IM-NG is enabled, the server MUST NOT enable carbons? -- Mathieu _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
