On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 19:44, Tedd Sterr <teddst...@outlook.com> wrote:
> *2019-03-20 (expired 2019-04-03)* > PASSED (-0:0:+5) *Last Call: XEP-0353 (Jingle Message Initiation)* - > https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0353.html > > > *2019-03-27 (expired 2019-04-10)* > > PASSED (-0:2:+3) > *Advance to Draft: XEP-0412 (XMPP Compliance Suites 2019)* - > https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0412.html > Dave: +0 (in two minds whether we should have a Compliance Suite if the > community is disinterested) > Georg: +1 > Jonas: +1 > Kev: -0 (our current annual Compliance Suites is unhelpful, and costs lots > of noise and time, but I won't block progress) > Link: +1 > > VETOED (-2:3:0) > *Proposed XMPP Extension: Automatic Trust Transfer (ATT)* - > https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/automatic-trust-transfer.html > Dave: -1 (don't think there's evidence of this being anything beyond a > very high-level sketch; not convinced we have the expertise to adequately > design a cryptographic trust system) > Georg: [abstained] > Jonas: [abstained] > Kev: -1 (don't think it's possible to implement from the spec as-is, but > more crucially there are fundamental security considerations > missing/non-obvious; publishing this right now would be ill-advised) > Link: [abstained] > > PASSED (-0:2:+3) > *PR #764 - XEP-0308: Clarify correcting a message multiple times* - > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/764 > Dave: +0 (pretty sure further clarifications are warranted, and it's nice > to have a single way of doing things - this even looks like the right way - > but not clear it makes any difference either way; would rather see some > suggestion that clients SHOULD treat a corrected correction as a correction > of the original message) > Georg: -0 (as long as there is wording that excludes MAM IDs and receipts > from the "all child elements" initial rationale) > Jonas: +1 > Kev: +1 (more logical or not, this clarification follows from the existing > text - correction affects a message's payloads, not its identity; not a > change of behaviour, so largely Editorial) > Link: +1 (once we reach the MAM companion table, every correction does > indeed pertain to the original message) > > > *2019-04-10 (expiring 2019-04-24)* > > *PR #781 - XEP-0308: Correct contents only* - > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/781 > Dave: [pending] > Georg: +0 (for the sake of not dying on hills) > Jonas: +1 (the text makes things clearer) > Kev: +1 > Link: +1 > > +1 > *PR #779 - XEP-0184: add a box about types and JIDs* - > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/779 > Dave: [pending] > Georg: +1 > Jonas: +1 > Kev: [on-list] > Link: +1 > +1 > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
