On 2019/09/04, JC Brand wrote: > I just read the latest Council minutes (thanks Ted Sterr!) > and noticed that message retractions came up. > > https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2019-September/036391.html > > > Link notes that multiple people have noticed previous Councils appear to > > have forgotten about Message Retraction [3] and, like Reactions, it's > > being held-up by the current 'message attachment' contention. > > I'm a bit out of the loop here, can someone please explain to me what the > "message attachment" contention is in regards to message retractions?
There doesn't seem to be any tl;dr on this yet. The idea is that Message Reactions[0] is currently being held hostage[1] by council because there is no """proper""" solution for referencing a message. I suggest you read the thread about reactions if you have time. There was also a (quite long) discussion[2] on xsf@ recently about how to tackle the problem. Funnily enough you're not the only one to ask about Message Retractions lately: - https://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/2019-06-26#2019-06-26-31c023899b7ed4f9 - https://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/2019-08-26#2019-08-26-c043182b2d770bac [0]: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2019-July/036271.html [1]: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2019-July/036322.html [2]: https://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/2019-08-29#2019-08-29-b9d6a6d670715887 -- Maxime “pep” Buquet
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
