On 30 Oct 2019, at 23:26, Kim Alvefur <z...@zash.se> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:52:35PM +0000, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> On 23 Oct 2019, at 15:25, Tedd Sterr <teddst...@outlook.com> wrote:
>>> Advance to Draft: XEP-0292 (vCard4 Over XMPP) - 
>>> https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0292.html
>>> Dave: [pending]
>>> Georg: [on-list]
>>> Jonas: [on-list]
>>> Kev: [on-list] (feels like we've done this already)
>>> Link: [on-list] (will have to gather data about has been done and what 
>>> should be done)
>> 
>> Sorry to do this, but ISTM there's unresolved feedback on list about
>> https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0292.html#contacts-storage 's "SHOULD
>> NOT include an ItemID, so that the pubsub service can assign those
>> identifiers". So I'm -1 on the basis that I don't see a resolution to
>> that (can easily change my vote if I've missed it).
> 
> Does this wording look sane?
> 
> https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/848/commits/21128e508c76bfe5e0f50b490d9f4849472a2955

It does to me, at first glance. It’s not immediately clear what this needs in 
terms of bumping. The old spec was effectively broken, I think.

/K
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to