http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2019-12-11?p=h#2019-12-11-08fd5c22f25c2599

Jonas will be unable to chair again; Dave is only too happy to take up the role.

1) Roll Call
Present: Zash, Georg, Jonas, Dave, Daniel

2) Agenda Bashing
Nobody has anything else to add.

3) Resurrection of Reactions
Kev is hoping to have replied to feedback on this by the end of the afternoon; 
remains convinced that Reactions are better done in the scope of something like 
Fastening.
Zash suggests that the authors of both Reactions and Fastening might work 
together to work this out - a similar thing was done with Message Forwarding 
and Carbons.
Dave would be happy to accept Reactions as-is, if the Fastening issues could be 
solved as a priority; is concerned that, as with other Experimental XEPs, such 
agreements have been ignored and the authors stubbornly refuse change having 
already gained tacit approval. Kev thinks it has already been shown that 
accepting for expediency and expecting significant change often leads to 
disappointment.
Zash says that an XEP not having a number doesn't appear to be stopping anyone 
from implementing. Kev suggests that if not having a number indicates not being 
endorsed, then having a number leads to people interpreting that as 
endorsement, despite the warning in Experimental XEPs. Daniel thinks 
endorsement should come with Draft - Kev agrees, but it doesn't in reality.
Kev is coming around to the idea of a pre-experimental stage, where it doesn't 
get a number, but is at least under IPR - Daniel thinks that is what 
Experimental should be (make experimental 'anything goes' and move things to 
Draft that belong in Draft.)
Kev believes that Reactions should be worked on until it's ready, and simply 
avoid the issue - takes the blame for stalling Fastening.

Dave doesn't think this is leading anywhere; Kev is replying to emails on the 
list, so unless that doesn't lead to further improvement, Dave will honour the 
previous Council's decision. Kev suggests Council apply pressure if he misses 
something again - he does care about this.

4) Outstanding Votes
[One each for Georg and Zash on Reactions - expiring next week.]

5) Date of Next
2019-12-18 1600 UTC

6) AOB
Daniel suggests having a discussion on process - Kev agrees; Dave thinks this 
should happen, but on-list, as Baord is required to give approval.

Kev would like to discuss Fastening and MAM - Dave thinks some form of Inbox is 
also worth considering; ESL's model [1] is a reasonable start, and will 
similarly need to understand concepts of Fastening and other ancillary messages.

Kev agrees that the Fastening/MAM story needs to be told; there has been some 
suggestion that Fastening won't be usable until MAM3 has been specified - 
wonders how strongly people hold that view. Secondly, a rough story that came 
out of the Summit is to get the messages either independently or with metadata, 
possibly with summaries of the metadata - are people still on-board with this, 
or do they have more input? Thirdly, Inbox is wanted, but would like to put 
that off for now.
Daniel needs to be convinced that Fastening will actually work with MAM and it 
won't have to be rewritten later.
Dave disagrees with the first point - agrees it urgently needs solving, but 
will be useless without Fastening; would appreciate more concrete ideas around 
the second point on the mailing list; also has a vested interest in Inbox.

Kev is hoping to get Fastening 'done' and then move onto MAM2/3/4, and hoping 
somebody else will sort out Inbox using the same mechanism.
Dave says one problem with Inbox is that it needs an understanding of message 
receipts, so consensus is needed on whether that means Message Receipts, Chat 
Markers, or something new. Kev says there are many problems to be solved with 
Inbox - several come with Fastening and enhanced archiving, and some are 
additional. Georg adds that Chat States come into play, which should be moved 
from Message to Presence semantics.

Dave will commit to resurrecting Inbox talks.

7) Close
Thank you all.

Kev thinks Jonas's ping to join for relevant discussion was useful; Dave agrees 
this is a plan worth repeating.


[1] https://mongooseim.readthedocs.io/en/latest/modules/mod_inbox/

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to