+1 on Proposed XMPP Extension: Character counting in message bodies Please add a clarification that counting has to happen before encoding / after decoding XML entities. Having multiple alternative encodings for & and < with different lengths really makes this case clear, despite the gymnasts performed by some developers to somehow make it work. Also I *really* don't want a reference to begin in the middle of an escaped entity!
Also please clarify that 0245 offsets are to be counted based on the verbatim "/me " string. Georg Am 24. Dezember 2019 16:00:07 MEZ schrieb Tedd Sterr <[email protected]>: >http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2019-12-18?p=h#2019-12-18-13f587f22d87d6d4 > >1) Roll Call >Present: Jonas, Kev, Zash, Dave, Daniel > >2) Agenda Bashing >Jonas notes one ProtoXEP, and asks for anything else - nothing is >forthcoming. > >3) Proposed XMPP Extension: Character counting in message bodies - >https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/charcount.html >Jonas: +1 >Zash: +1 >Daniel: +1 >Dave: +1 >Georg: [on-list] > >4) Outstanding Votes >Jonas notes Georg's vote on Charcount, and the outstanding votes on >Reactions (which expires today.) >Zash votes on Reactions: +0 (seems to be moving now so I don't object) > >Dave has a report on Reactions and Fastenings for AOB - Jonas suggests >giving it now in case it influences outstanding votes. >Kev and Dave have been working through the feedback and trying to get >Fastenings and MAM to play nicely together, and still have some >compatibility with full stanza encryption; believe they have something >implementable. >Kev is currently updating Fastening, and wonders whether anyone minds >if he makes changes without bumping, given that nobody is actually >using it yet - Jonas says it's Experimental, so go ahead. >Jonas is looking forward to reading this proposal; doesn't think >there's much else to discuss on this until that's available. > >Jonas checks whether anyone wants to update their votes on Reactions - >Dave is currently vetoing. Georg votes -1, as he agrees with Dave's >reasoning that resubmitting for a new Council is formally problematic, >also because there is movement on Fastening. Jonas similarly changes >his vote to -1, but will consider a resubmission if and only if >Fastening isn't turning out to be useful. Zash says "this is fine." >Daniel agrees with the decision to veto, but isn't going to change his >vote. > >Kev is trying to maintain momentum, and would like to be chased if that >appears to stop. >Reactions' author is fine with the veto in that it at least brought >movement in the Fastening discussion - Kev reiterates his offer of >updating Reactions once Fastening has stabilised. Dave is glad all of >this is seeing progress. > >5) Date of Next >Jonas doesn't expect it makes sense to have a meeting on the 25th >(Christmas Day); the following Wednesday would be January 1st, so the >2nd is preferred. > >2020-01-02 1600 UTC > >6) Any other Business >Jonas notes that the Character Counting vote will expire before the >next meeting. > >Georg mentions that MattJ and himself have been implementing XEP-0401 >(Easy User Onboarding), with some small deviations; thanks Zash for >creating the foundation for it. > >7) Close >Everyone thanks everyone. > >Jonas specifically thanks Kev and Dave for putting in effort on >Fastening, and Larma for their patience, and Georg and MattJ for their >work on XEP-0401. > >Guten Rutsch ins Neue Jahr! > > >Jonas has live-updated the Spreadsheet of Doom: >https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ANu9KGmNf2r-qpLYqF7NdJTtqA1GIu55rf2deKbM0GA > >Georg nudges Zash to finalise his vote on Reactions - Zash changes his >vote to -1 (agree with Jonas; glad it's moving forward). -- +++ Sent from Mobile +++ http://op-co.de/ +++ _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
