See, this discussion is not going to go anywhere. We do have different opinions. I am fine with that. Yes, this means additional work for both of us. Yes, this means we'll likely have opposing XEP proposals for some time. I am fine with that. Let's just keep it at this.
On 1/8/20 11:06 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: > we design fastenings such that they summarize effectively, and we do so > by imposing rules around their syntax At least we kind of agree that XEP-0422 is not meant to be generic, but meant to work well with your proposed MAM-FC, thus making other approaches harder to explore. If I understood Flo correctly, this was basically the question he wanted to have answered. Marvin _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
