On Dienstag, 11. Februar 2020 10:20:01 CET Kevin Smith wrote: > On 11 Feb 2020, at 09:17, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: > > On 10 Feb 2020, at 10:09, Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net <mailto:d...@cridland.net>> wrote: > >> PEDANTRY WARNING! > >> ... > >> > >> 3a) Call for Experience: XEP-0198 (Stream Management) - > >> https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0198.html > >> <https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0198.html> > >> > >> > >> I do not need to vote on this, because the Council doesn't vote on a Call > >> For Experience.> > > Surely this was an advisory vote requested by the Editors, and if the > > Chair decides to ask Council for such a vote that’s fine? > (Note to Jonas: Nod and say “Yes, that’s totally what it was”).
Kind of. XEP-0001 is a bit weird on this, since I’m not sure it is (or should be) the Editors job to find out when a XEP is ready for Final. As the Editor, I am more comfortable to get guidance from Council on this. As Council Chair, I prefer to ask the members before I put out orders/requests in the name of Council. So, yes, this is *indeed* what has happened. Except that some of the round trips weren’t public because they happened in my head. This is probably not ideal because it’s then not clear to observers and, indeed, fellow Council members what’s actually going on, and I need to take care to more clearly word the vote subjects. I take Daves comments as endorsement of the general motion though and will process this accordingly on the Editor side of things. kind regards, Jonas
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________