On Mittwoch, 1. April 2020 18:31:01 CEST Tedd Sterr wrote:
> 4a) Proposed XMPP Extension: MUC Presence Versioning -
> https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/muc-presence-versioning.html
> 
> Jonas: [on-list] (haven't read it yet)
> Daniel: +1
> Zash: +1 (interesting and seemed Good Enough™ for Experimental)
> Georg: +1
> Dave: [pending]

+1 for moving it to Experimental.

I have a couple of notes though:

- The section §5 Additional Measures needs a bit of cleanup.

  Either the additional measures directly interact with the presence
  versioning, in which case it should be moved to the use cases/business
  rules section and extended with examples, or they do not, in which
  case they do not belong into this document.

- Attaching an unnamespaced attribute to the existing MUC <x/> element in 
  presence stanzas is not ok.

  This should be fixed by introducing an appropriate child element of either
  <presence/> or the <{muc}x/> element.


kind regards,
Jonas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to