On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 13:26, Andrew Nenakhov < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 16:51, <[email protected]>: > >> One example use-case for Quick Response is the memberbot, which asks >> yes/no multiple times during membership voting. Memberbot does not use a >> form to ask for yes/no, but a plaintext message. The idea of Quick Response >> is to enable memberbot to tell clients that "yes" and "no" are possible >> answers, so that clients can offer convenient UI to quickly select one of >> these possibilities. I think forms would be helplessly overkill here. >> > > Well, forms are a good standard way of presenting a user with different > buttons and options. It can be used for any kind of bots in a fairly > straightforward way. > I think that bloating a number of XEPs that are to be supported by various > application developers is wrong way to go. > > In short, we are unlikely to support this. > I read this as you wouldn't support this going to Draft. I assume you might reconsider if it became widely deployed? Dave.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
