Hi, I totally understand the need for this. And the lack of something like this has prevented me from implementing SCRAM-*-PLUS in Conversations for years. However I don’t like the syntax at all and would like us to either find a different syntax or just fix this for TLS1.3 onwards by properly defining and implementing a default channel binding mechanism that works for everyone. (See the other thread.)
Doing SCRAM-*-PLUS only for TLS1.3+ feels like an OK compromise to me. cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
