Am Sa., 8. Aug. 2020 um 07:13 Uhr schrieb Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]>: > > Am Sa., 8. Aug. 2020 um 07:07 Uhr schrieb Ruslan N. Marchenko > <[email protected]>: > > > > Hi Standards, > > > > I'm trying to extend PEP server implementation to support OMEMO and > > stumbled upon following issue: the OMEMO 5.3.2 stipulates the max_items > > should be specified in the publish-options form, however neither form > > registry nor XEP-0060 allow anything but access-model in the publishing > > options. > > > > Is it my mis-interpretation of the form registry enforcement or OMEMO > > needs to add a statement that it is going to extend the registery with > > additional fields? > > > > I.e. I know the form can contain any arbitrary data just wonder if any > > implementation applies some additional validation of the publish > > options which may lead to iq errors.
Sorry. I hit send too early. Yes XEP-0060 mandates very specific rules on when to IQ-error out. (Essentially each time it can’t match a publish-option to a corresponding node configuration.) It explicitly states that you can’t just ignore unknown options. > it MUST reject the publication upon encountering unknown fields. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
