On Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2021 22:59:23 CET Sam Whited wrote: > I hate to go down the rabbit trail of what "widely used means" but we > seem to have different definitions of that too. The vast majority of > projects on the web do not appear to use this format. Some do, but they > seem to be a very small minority (albeit from a very very small sample > of me searching specifically for projects that do use it, which should > weight towards using it, and then picking a bunch of random projects > that I use myself and seeing which ones use it). > > I am not concerned with making something that is perfect over something > that is good, I would settle for something that is mediocre over > actively harmful and bad. > > If effort is the concern, I will happily create and document an > alternative just to avoid the over engineered mess we seem to want to > find ourselves in.
Oh, and to add: This was first brought up in July 2019 [1], discussion was furthered a month later and you have been silent for 1.5 years on this -- starting to complain after people have invested is not fair to anyone. regards, Jonas [1]: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2019-July/036307.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
