On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 15:24, Tedd Sterr <[email protected]> wrote:
> 4. The original version (XEP-0242/0243) had two simple categories, Core > and Advanced, and that was all; later versions just continued with that. > The IM Suite, especially, is becoming quite top-heavy, so adding a middle > level would be good - but what to call it? Instead of names, how about > simply Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 - right now that would map Core to > Level 1 and Advanced to Level 3, then a subset of Level 3 could make up > Level 2. Note that not all Suites require 3 levels (or even 2 in the case > of Web). [This also fits nicely with a compliance badge design idea I have.] > I agree with everything you said, but I'm especially in favour of fixing this one. Part of the goal of these things is to help summarize XMPP compliance of a piece of software to people who aren't intimate with XMPP. There is no planet on which describing a piece of software as "Core Core" makes sense. I'd be in favour of either switching to "Basic"/"Advanced" (I think "Basic" was frowned upon originally, which is why it wasn't used), or to numbered levels as you propose. Regards, Matthew
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
