Hi, I've been looking into our legacy namespaces recently (the ones starting with `http://jabber.org/`), with a goal to implement HTTP Redirects to the respective XEPs (first map at https://op-co.de/tmp/namespacemap.txt)
I identified a bunch of inconsistencies in examples, for some of which I've already opened PRs. One of the things that I'm not sure about is XEP-0072, where two different SI-Pub namespaces are used: Within a message element, only mentioned in the example: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0072.html#example-8 <sipub xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/si-pub' /> And within an IQ element, mentioned in normative text and in an example: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0072.html#example-9 <start xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/sipub' /> I assume that having two different namespaces was not a deliberate design decision, but my question is: Do these examples reflect the actual in-the-wild use? Can we harmonize them / fix the examples? At least in https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0137.html#example-1 and https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0332.html#example-13 it looks like <sipub xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/sipub' /> is actually a thing. Kind regards, Georg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
