* Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> [2022-06-14 22:07]:
> a) Proposed XMPP Extension: WebSocket S2S
> (https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/websocket-s2s.html)

+1 though I wonder if it makes sense to release a XEP for s2s where we
have an RFC for c2s. Maybe harmonizing both under the same organization
would be more beneficial in the mid- to long term?

> b) Proposed XMPP Extension: XMPP over QUIC
> (https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/xmpp-over-quic.html)

+1

The wording "Client or server MUST ..." is ambiguous. We should adopt
the "initiating entity" and "receiving entity" wording from XMPP-Core
instead.

I'd like to hear a proper rationale for udp/443 and not the IANA
assigned port (although the assignment is only for tcp/5222), and we
should probably request udp/5222 for XMPP-over-QUIC.

The ALPN entries are already assigned, so that part looks good.


Georg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to